Find and Select Predictable Clear Aligner Cases

The information provided in this article is intended for use by licensed dental and healthcare professionals only, for informational purposes only, and does not constitute medical or dental advice or replace clinical judgement. The treating clinician bears sole responsibility for all diagnostic and therapeutic decisions made in connection with patient care.

Overview: This guide helps dental practices identify profitable and predictable clear aligner cases while estimating treatment length using the "Rule of 3" framework.

Evaluate Case Predictability with the Rule of 3

The "Rule of 3" is a framework used to identify case predictability based on specific treatment goals. To use this guide, track how many of the following goals apply to a potential clear aligner case:

Predictable Treatment Goals

  • Midline Discrepancy: Maximum of 1.5 mm of shift per arch; requires Interproximal Reduction (IPR) and sufficient overjet.

  • Overjet Reduction: Requires IPR on the maxillary (upper) arch.

  • Open Bite Reduction: Anterior open bites are highly predictable for only 1–2 mm of closure.

  • Other Goals: Includes overbite correction, anterior spacing per arch, anterior crowding per arch, and crossbite per teeth.

Estimate Clear Aligner Treatment Duration

Clinicians should use the following thresholds to provide patients with a treatment time range:

Was this article helpful?
9 out of 11 found this helpful